Range Impact, Inc. (RNGE) · Peers
Range Impact against the 11 other companies here in its SEC industry, Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 12, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | RNGE | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $65.03M | median $4.81B | 11 of 12 |
| P/E | 5.6× | median 32.7× | 8 of 8 |
| P/S | 13.4× | median 1.0× | 1 of 12 |
| FCF yield | -4.3% | median 3.7% | 9 of 12 |
| Gross margin | -0.8% | median 15.1% | 10 of 11 |
| Operating margin | -89.0% | median 4.6% | 12 of 12 |
| Net margin | 239.4% | median 1.0% | 1 of 12 |
| ROIC | -14.9% | median 9.0% | 8 of 10 |
| ROE | 53.1% | median 10.4% | 1 of 10 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 48.4% | median 4.2% | 1 of 9 |
| Current ratio | 0.8× | median 1.6× | 12 of 12 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 6.4% | median 0.6% | 1 of 12 |
| Share count change | 4.4% | median 0.3% | 5 of 11 |
Green where Range Impact is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNGERange Impact, Inc. | $65.03M | P/E 5.6× | -14.9% | 3.1 |
| FERFerrovial N.V. | $35.61B | P/E 27.8× | 19.9% | 5.8 |
| JJacobs Solutions Inc. | $16.51B | P/E 48.8× | 9.0% | 4.7 |
| STRLSterling Infrastructure, Inc. | $12.98B | P/E 30.1× | 40.4% | 6.8 |
| FLRFluor Corp | $6.28B | P/E – | -23.9% | 4.6 |
| MWHSOLV Energy, Inc. | $4.83B | P/E 355.0× | – | 4.7 |
| GVAGranite Construction Inc | $4.81B | P/E – | 14.0% | 5.5 |
| ROADConstruction Partners, Inc. | $4.65B | P/E 32.7× | 8.6% | 5.4 |
| KBRKBR, Inc. | $4.59B | P/E 10.8× | 14.7% | 5.5 |
| ORNOrion Group Holdings Inc | $344.88M | P/E 40.2× | 4.2% | 4.6 |
| SHIMShimmick Corp | $99.62M | P/E – | -93.7% | 3.7 |
| SLNDSouthland Holdings, Inc. | $40.28M | P/E – | – | 3.7 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.