Every figure this model derived for RIO.L, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
8,872,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalents
2026-01-01
current assets
21,569,000,000
CurrentAssets
2026-01-01
current liabilities
11,603,000,000
CurrentLiabilities
2023-01-01
equity
62,203,000,000
EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent
2026-01-01
interest expense
1,062,000,000
FinanceCosts
2025-12-31
ocf
16,832,000,000
CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
57,638,000,000
Revenue
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
RIO.L on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
25.91
current ratio
1.86
current ratio reported
1.86
ebit cagr
-15.87
ebit yoy
-4.58
ev ebit
12.32
ev owner earnings
10.93
ev sales
3.19
fcf margin
29.2
growth cv
2.79
interest cover
14.06
net debt ebitda
0.83
operating margin
25.91
owner earnings margin
29.2
revenue growth
7.42
revenue growth per share
7.42
roic
15.83
rule of 40
33.33
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about RIO.L's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
reports in USD and quotes in GBP, so the share price is converted at 1 GBP = 1.3590 USD as at 2026-08-28. Only the price is converted: every figure from the filing is as reported, and only the multiples built on market capitalisation carry the rate
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions