ParaZero Technologies Ltd. (PRZO) · Peers
ParaZero Technologies against the 12 other companies here in its SEC industry, Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment, Nec. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 13, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | PRZO | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $9.99M | median $2.72B | 12 of 13 |
| P/S | 9.5× | median 5.4× | 3 of 13 |
| FCF yield | -58.4% | median 0.0% | 12 of 13 |
| Gross margin | 4.8% | median 32.2% | 13 of 13 |
| Operating margin | -721.1% | median 10.9% | 13 of 13 |
| Net margin | -517.1% | median 5.7% | 13 of 13 |
| ROE | -171.5% | median 7.2% | 11 of 11 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 9.6% | median 9.4% | 5 of 9 |
| Current ratio | 4.0× | median 3.4× | 6 of 13 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 117.8% | median 2.1% | 1 of 13 |
| Share count change | 57.0% | median 0.7% | 1 of 10 |
Green where ParaZero Technologies is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd. | $9.99M | P/E – | – | 3.1 |
| TDGTransDigm Group INC | $62.98B | P/E 29.6× | 17.9% | 6.5 |
| ESLTElbit Systems Ltd | $35.08B | P/E 65.7× | 14.6% | 5.8 |
| ARXSArxis, Inc. | $21.74B | P/E 449.1× | – | 4.3 |
| LOARLoar Holdings Inc. | $5.78B | P/E 85.0× | 5.0% | 5.6 |
| KRMNKarman Holdings Inc. | $4.60B | P/E 123.6× | 16.2% | 5.9 |
| ATROBAstronics Corp | $2.87B | P/E 36.2× | 20.0% | 5.9 |
| DCODucommun Inc | $2.57B | P/E – | -1.6% | 4.0 |
| AADXApplied Aerospace & Defense, Inc. | $1.96B | P/E – | – | 2.7 |
| PKEPark Aerospace Corp | $566.18M | P/E 44.5× | 28.7% | 6.9 |
| CVUCPI Aerostructures Inc | $64.59M | P/E 17.3× | 14.2% | 5.5 |
| AIRIAir Industries Group | $12.08M | P/E – | -1.0% | 3.4 |
| EHEHang Holdings Ltd | $529,461 | P/E – | -404.9% | 4.0 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.