Eplus Inc (PLUS) · Peers
Eplus against the 8 other companies here in its SEC industry, Wholesale-Computers & Peripheral Equipment & Software. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 9, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | PLUS | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $2.45B | median $1.21B | 3 of 8 |
| P/E | 19.6× | median 17.4× | 3 of 6 |
| Forward P/E | 17.2× | median 12.4× | 3 of 6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× | median 10.5× | 4 of 6 |
| P/S | 1.0× | median 0.8× | 2 of 8 |
| FCF yield | 2.2% | median 1.9% | 4 of 8 |
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | median 0.8% | 2 of 6 |
| Gross margin | 25.2% | median 12.2% | 2 of 9 |
| Operating margin | 6.9% | median 2.8% | 2 of 9 |
| Net margin | 5.1% | median 1.2% | 1 of 9 |
| ROIC | 21.4% | median 10.3% | 3 of 9 |
| ROE | 11.7% | median 9.4% | 3 of 9 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 7.6% | median 18.6% | 4 of 6 |
| EPS growth (yearly) | 6.4% | median 5.4% | 2 of 4 |
| Current ratio | 2.8× | median 2.1× | 4 of 9 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.5% | median 0.2% | 3 of 9 |
| Share count change | -1.1% | median 1.9% | 6 of 9 |
Green where Eplus is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLUSEplus Inc | $2.45B | P/E 19.6× | 21.4% | 5.4 |
| SNXSynnex Corporation | $19.73B | P/E 17.4× | 11.3% | 5.2 |
| INGMIngram Micro Holding Corp | $6.16B | P/E 14.3× | 9.2% | 4.8 |
| CNXNPC Connection Inc | $2.25B | P/E 23.5× | 15.1% | 5.3 |
| SCSCScansource, Inc. | $1.21B | P/E 15.3× | 8.4% | 5.7 |
| CLMBClimb Global Solutions, Inc. | $594.53M | P/E 29.0× | 32.0% | 5.7 |
| CGTLCreative Global Technology Holdings Ltd | $72.36M | P/E – | -58.2% | 3.3 |
| PNPN Smart Energy Ltd | $58.98M | P/E – | -15.9% | 5.0 |
| WDSPWorld Scan Project, Inc. | – | P/E – | 56.4% | 5.3 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.