Every figure this model derived for PINS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
PINS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
28.09
current ratio
4.13
current ratio reported
3.81
deferred revenue growth
102.96
dilution pct
-1.52
ebit yoy
3.86
ev ebit
56.14
ev owner earnings
48.66
ev sales
2.76
fcf margin
28.11
growth cv
0.77
operating margin
4.92
owner earnings margin
5.68
revenue growth
16.64
revenue growth per share
18.44
roic
6.81
rule of 40
21.56
sbc pct revenue
22.43
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about PINS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
no interest expense tagged while 981M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect