Every figure this model derived for PDD, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
PDD on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
23.54
current ratio
2.43
current ratio reported
2.43
dilution pct
0.22
ebit cagr
87.28
ebit yoy
-10.37
ev ebit
31.68
ev owner earnings
29.79
ev sales
6.83
fcf margin
24.76
growth cv
0.51
operating margin
21.56
owner earnings margin
22.93
revenue growth
14.45
revenue growth per share
14.2
rule of 40
36.01
sbc pct revenue
1.84
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about PDD's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2020-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
invested capital is -1,276M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
gross profit not tagged since 2022-12-31; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage