Stock Scorer

Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Ltd (NCI) · Peers

Neo-Concept International Group Holdings against the 13 other companies here in its SEC industry, Apparel & Other Finishd Prods Of Fabrics & Similar Matl. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 14, highest first.

Measure by measure

MeasureNCIPeer medianRank
Market value $2.48M median $2.56B 13 of 13
P/E 58.3× median 16.0× 2 of 10
EV/EBITDA 7.5× median 8.8× 8 of 10
P/S 0.1× median 0.9× 13 of 13
FCF yield 89.9% median 6.8% 1 of 13
Gross margin 36.9% median 52.2% 11 of 14
Operating margin 1.3% median 7.5% 11 of 14
Net margin 0.2% median 6.0% 11 of 14
ROIC 2.2% median 8.0% 11 of 14
ROE 0.6% median 10.9% 11 of 13
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0× median 1.8× 3 of 6
Current ratio 2.6× median 2.2× 5 of 14
Stock pay / revenue 0.0% median 0.8% 14 of 14
Share count change 3.7% median -0.3% 4 of 14

Green where Neo-Concept International Group Holdings is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.

The peers, largest first

CompanyMarket valueP/EROICScore
NCINeo-Concept International Group Holdings Ltd $2.48M P/E 58.3× 2.2% 5.2
ASAmer Sports, Inc. $16.74B P/E 38.0× 8.0% 5.7
LULUlululemon athletica inc. $10.53B P/E 7.2× 48.9% 7.0
LEVILevi Strauss & Co $7.96B P/E 12.5× 23.5% 5.9
GILGildan Activewear Inc. $7.58B P/E 19.0× 6.2% 4.8
FIGSFIGS, Inc. $3.73B P/E 60.3× 36.9% 5.6
COLMColumbia Sportswear Co $3.08B P/E 14.9× 20.8% 6.0
UAAUnder Armour, Inc. $2.05B P/E – -5.8% 4.0
CRICarters Inc $1.15B P/E 5.9× 23.7% 5.7
SGCSuperior Group of Companies, Inc. $214.78M P/E 26.0× 4.9% 5.3
JRSHJerash Holdings (US), Inc. $78.36M P/E 16.0× 11.5% 6.2
PASWPing An Biomedical Co., Ltd. $15.04M P/E – -26.4% 4.3
PMNTPerfect Moment Ltd. $5.32M P/E – -696.0% 4.1
ZGNErmenegildo Zegna N.V. – P/E – 6.4% 4.3

The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.