Minerals Technologies Inc (MTX) · Peers
Minerals Technologies against the 10 other companies here in its SEC industry, Industrial Inorganic Chemicals. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 11, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | MTX | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $1.96B | median $507.54M | 3 of 11 |
| Forward P/E | 10.7× | median 18.6× | 6 of 6 |
| P/S | 0.9× | median 1.2× | 7 of 10 |
| FCF yield | 6.1% | median -3.6% | 2 of 11 |
| Dividend yield | 0.7% | median 2.7% | 8 of 8 |
| Gross margin | 24.5% | median 20.7% | 4 of 9 |
| Operating margin | -1.3% | median 2.9% | 6 of 10 |
| Net margin | -3.1% | median -2.4% | 6 of 10 |
| ROIC | -1.0% | median 3.5% | 6 of 10 |
| ROE | -4.3% | median -4.9% | 5 of 10 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 2.8% | median 1.6% | 3 of 9 |
| Current ratio | 1.4× | median 2.5× | 8 of 11 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.6% | median 0.4% | 5 of 10 |
| Share count change | -2.8% | median 0.0% | 10 of 10 |
Green where Minerals Technologies is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTXMinerals Technologies Inc | $1.96B | P/E – | -1.0% | 4.8 |
| LINLinde plc Ordinary Shares | $229.77B | P/E 31.7× | 11.9% | 5.1 |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals, Inc. | $66.71B | P/E – | -3.6% | 3.9 |
| KROKronos Worldwide Inc | $855.17M | P/E – | -2.0% | 3.8 |
| LXULsb Industries Inc | $765.33M | P/E 20.8× | 6.5% | 5.7 |
| TROXTronox Holdings plc | $554.16M | P/E – | -4.2% | 3.4 |
| LXFRLuxfer Holdings PLC | $460.93M | P/E 59.9× | 7.6% | 4.6 |
| VHIValhi Inc | $415.76M | P/E – | 3.5% | 3.9 |
| NLNL Industries Inc | $324.20M | P/E – | 4.8% | 5.5 |
| LTBRLIGHTBRIDGE Corp | $195.16M | P/E – | -49.7% | 4.0 |
| HGASGlobal Gas Corp | $378,399 | P/E – | – | 2.8 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.