Every figure this model derived for MSC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
109,401,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
131,490,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
180,042,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
523,887,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
126,266,000
InterestExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
210,320,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
694,566,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
0
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2022-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
MSC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
40.61
current ratio
0.73
current ratio reported
0.73
ebit yoy
83.6
fcf margin
30.28
growth cv
1.95
interest cover
0.55
net debt ebitda
6.79
operating margin
10.08
owner earnings margin
30.28
revenue growth
8.67
revenue growth per share
8.67
roic
2.27
rule of 40
18.75
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about MSC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2022-12-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2020-12-31 (2068 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left