Every figure this model derived for MLP, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
2,559,000
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2025-12-31
cash
3,282,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
7,658,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
6,550,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
31,058,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
356,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
16,153,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
3,931,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
MLP on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-5.29
current ratio
1.37
current ratio reported
1.17
deferred revenue growth
-2.3
ev owner earnings
-50.8
ev sales
19.29
fcf margin
-13.64
growth cv
1.4
operating margin
-36.33
owner earnings margin
-37.97
revenue growth
-4.11
revenue growth per share
-4.11
roic
-16.51
rule of 40
-40.45
sbc pct revenue
24.34
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about MLP's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (19.3x) instead
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 3M of net cash against a 2M annual burn is 1.3 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability
no interest expense tagged while 0M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect