Mind Technology, Inc (MIND) · Peers
Mind Technology against the 9 other companies here in its SEC industry, Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 10, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | MIND | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $39.54M | median $9.34B | 10 of 10 |
| P/E | 30.2× | median 26.6× | 2 of 7 |
| Forward P/E | 54.4× | median 23.0× | 1 of 7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.0× | median 16.7× | 7 of 7 |
| P/S | 0.9× | median 4.0× | 10 of 10 |
| FCF yield | -8.4% | median 3.9% | 9 of 10 |
| Gross margin | 45.5% | median 43.3% | 4 of 8 |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | median 10.6% | 7 of 9 |
| Net margin | 3.1% | median 10.5% | 7 of 8 |
| ROIC | 11.7% | median 10.9% | 3 of 8 |
| ROE | 3.2% | median 9.2% | 7 of 9 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 15.4% | median 6.7% | 3 of 9 |
| Current ratio | 5.6× | median 3.6× | 3 of 10 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 4.2% | median 0.8% | 4 of 10 |
| Share count change | 104.3% | median 0.2% | 1 of 10 |
Green where Mind Technology is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINDMind Technology, Inc | $39.54M | P/E 30.2× | 11.7% | 5.3 |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corporation | $72.51B | P/E 16.1× | 11.4% | 6.2 |
| GRMNGarmin Ltd | $54.92B | P/E 31.6× | 23.7% | 7.4 |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc | $45.42B | P/E 24.2× | 10.9% | 6.4 |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Incorporated | $28.68B | P/E 29.4× | 7.8% | 7.0 |
| DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. | $9.34B | P/E 29.0× | 10.5% | 6.5 |
| LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc. | $1.78B | P/E – | – | 4.1 |
| NNNextnav Inc. | $1.66B | P/E – | -16.0% | 2.7 |
| AERGApplied Energetics, Inc. | $186.39M | P/E – | – | 2.5 |
| CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc. | $111.68M | P/E 22.6× | 14.3% | 7.8 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.