Every figure this model derived for MI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
2,812,921
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
105,864,125
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
6,179,939
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
99,684,186
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
269,444
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-12-31
ocf
-99,302,091
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
725,781
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2021-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
MI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-148.09
current ratio
59.03
current ratio reported
17.13
deferred revenue growth
0.8
dilution pct
111.23
ev owner earnings
-0.58
ev sales
79.91
interest cover
-3.99
operating margin
-148.09
revenue growth
-2.01
revenue growth per share
-53.61
roic
-0.73
rule of 40
-150.1
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about MI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: owner earnings margin, fcf margin, ocf margin -- owner earnings margin came out at -13,682% against a scale that tops out near 1,750%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 725,781 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2021-12-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (79.9x) instead
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: owner earnings
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions