Stock Scorer

Lam Research Corp (LRCX) · Peers

Lam Research against the 14 other companies here in its SEC industry, Special Industry Machinery, Nec. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 15, highest first.

Measure by measure

MeasureLRCXPeer medianRank
Market value $330.27B median $281.78M 2 of 15
P/E 45.5× median 41.5× 6 of 11
Forward P/E 27.9× median 29.7× 6 of 9
EV/EBITDA 37.7× median 17.2× 3 of 11
P/S 14.2× median 2.8× 2 of 15
FCF yield 1.5% median 1.8% 9 of 15
Dividend yield 0.4% median 0.7% 3 of 4
Gross margin 50.5% median 43.4% 5 of 15
Operating margin 35.3% median 5.4% 1 of 15
Net margin 31.3% median 7.3% 2 of 15
ROIC 80.6% median 10.0% 3 of 14
ROE 58.3% median 8.1% 1 of 14
Revenue growth (4y, yearly) 7.8% median 5.6% 6 of 15
Current ratio 4.3× median 5.9× 9 of 15
Stock pay / revenue 1.7% median 2.5% 9 of 15
Share count change -2.3% median 0.2% 12 of 15

Green where Lam Research is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.

The peers, largest first

CompanyMarket valueP/EROICScore
LRCXLam Research Corp $330.27B P/E 45.5× 80.6% 5.9
ASMLASML Holding N.V. New York Registry Shares $632.81B P/E 59.2× 89.4% 6.2
ACMRACM Research, Inc. $3.81B P/E 25.4× 10.3% 4.9
ACLSAxcelis Technologies Inc $3.35B P/E 36.1× 10.0% 5.3
VECOVeeco Instruments Inc $2.61B P/E 112.4× 2.1% 4.7
AZTAAzenta, Inc. $1.49B P/E – -11.7% 4.6
CRCTCricut, Inc. $1.35B P/E 15.4× 103.1% 6.6
ERIIEnergy Recovery, Inc. $339.45M P/E 22.1× 14.2% 6.2
ASYSAmtech Systems Inc $224.10M P/E 56.0× 16.0% 5.3
VELOVelo3D, Inc. $218.45M P/E – -62.5% 4.5
SOTKSono TEK Corp $96.82M P/E 47.0× 44.7% 6.2
TRTTrio-Tech International $49.75M P/E 143.0× 2.2% 5.2
CVVCVD Equipment Corp $26.90M P/E 2.7× -27.2% 4.8
GLGIGreystone Logistics, Inc. $7.09M P/E – -7.6% 3.1
OCLNOriginclear, Inc. $4.87M P/E – – 4.6

The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.