Every figure this model derived for KC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
860,569,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
1,576,328,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
1,347,234,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
1,332,316,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
71,220,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-12-31
ocf
543,540,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
1,366,864,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
63,907,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
KC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.54
current ratio
1.2
current ratio reported
1.17
deferred revenue growth
13.37
dilution pct
12.28
ev owner earnings
100.16
ev sales
35.15
fcf margin
39.77
growth cv
2.65
interest cover
-1.55
net debt ebitda
2.44
operating margin
-8.09
owner earnings margin
35.09
revenue growth
28.16
revenue growth per share
14.14
roic
-4.53
rpo growth
336.29
rule of 40
20.07
sbc pct revenue
4.68
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about KC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (35.1x) instead
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`