Every figure this model derived for JL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
JL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
8.38
current ratio
2.85
current ratio reported
2.68
deferred revenue growth
18.49
dilution pct
7.64
ebit cagr
-24.3
ebit yoy
530.63
ev ebit
3.8
ev owner earnings
1.64
ev sales
0.23
fcf margin
15.88
growth cv
6.64
interest cover
23.59
operating margin
6.14
owner earnings margin
14.2
revenue growth
37.69
revenue growth per share
27.92
roic
32.86
rule of 40
43.83
sbc pct revenue
1.68
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about JL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2025-03-31 (1y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
revenue period ends 2025-03-31 (515 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth