Every figure this model derived for IX, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
75,075,000,000
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
1,334,945,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
equity
4,482,500,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
193,889,000,000
InterestExpense
2026-03-31
ocf
1,369,567,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
3,330,831,000,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
IX on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
25.85
dilution pct
-2.18
ebit cagr
57.51
ebit yoy
37.5
fcf margin
38.86
interest cover
2.35
net debt ebitda
5.38
operating margin
13.7
owner earnings margin
38.86
revenue growth
15.86
revenue growth per share
18.44
roic
3.96
rpo growth
-0.28
rule of 40
29.56
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about IX's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
reports in JPY while its share price is quoted in USD, and no exchange rate could be used (no rate for USD to JPY that is less than 30 days old, and this is not a refresh). Every multiple would pair one currency with another, so none of them is a ratio — set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml in JPY to score it
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left