Every figure this model derived for IVFH, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
64,619
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2026-06-30
cash
1,820,127
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
10,099,125
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
3,501,966
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
8,489,608
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
30,587
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
750,162
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
53,088,111
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
249,378
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
IVFH on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
5.36
current ratio
3.2
current ratio reported
2.88
deferred revenue growth
-76.0
dilution pct
6.37
ebit yoy
-3.82
fcf margin
1.29
growth cv
3.64
interest cover
75.01
operating margin
4.32
owner earnings margin
0.82
revenue growth
-13.66
revenue growth per share
-18.83
roic
25.94
rule of 40
-9.34
sbc pct revenue
0.47
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about IVFH's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions