Stock Scorer

International Paper (IP) · Peers

International Paper against the 17 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 26xx (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 18, highest first.

Measure by measure

MeasureIPPeer medianRank
Market value $18.03B median $960.81M 4 of 17
Forward P/E 26.8× median 14.7× 1 of 11
P/S 0.7× median 0.4× 5 of 17
FCF yield 2.7% median 6.0% 13 of 17
Dividend yield 5.4% median 4.3% 3 of 11
Gross margin 29.8% median 17.9% 4 of 18
Net margin -14.2% median 1.6% 15 of 18
ROE -23.8% median 6.0% 14 of 16
Revenue growth (4y, yearly) 5.1% median 1.6% 5 of 17
Current ratio 1.1× median 1.5× 15 of 18
Stock pay / revenue 0.0% median 0.3% 18 of 18
Share count change 42.8% median 0.1% 1 of 18

Green where International Paper is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.

The peers, largest first

CompanyMarket valueP/EROICScore
IPInternational Paper $18.03B P/E – – 4.2
KMBKimberly-Clark Corporation $35.11B P/E 18.0× 25.9% 5.0
SWSmurfit Westrock plc $21.59B P/E 43.4× 3.6% 4.6
PKGPackaging Corp of America $21.03B P/E 30.4× 10.1% 4.8
AVYAvery Dennison Corp $13.29B P/E 18.8× 16.1% 5.2
SONSonoco Products Co $4.92B P/E 4.8× 10.0% 5.5
REYNReynolds Consumer Products Inc. $4.81B P/E 14.7× 10.9% 5.1
GPKGraphic Packaging Holding Co $2.54B P/E 13.1× 4.3% 4.5
SLVMSylvamo Corp $1.30B P/E 17.1× 8.0% 4.4
MATVMativ Holdings, Inc. $618.68M P/E – 3.8% 4.9
RYAMRayonier Advanced Materials $472.83M P/E – -4.4% 4.1
MAGNMagnera Corp $395.59M P/E – 1.9% 5.4
CLWClearwater Paper Corp $311.22M P/E – -3.6% 3.9
PACKRanpak Holdings Corp. $296.72M P/E – -1.1% 5.1
MERCMercer International Inc. $12.73M P/E – -20.2% 3.3
DSSDSS, Inc. $6.13M P/E – -41.4% 3.6
ITPIT Tech Packaging, Inc. $2.32M P/E – -5.2% 5.4
SUZSuzano S.A. – P/E – 6.5% 4.3

The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.