InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) · Peers
InterDigital against the 11 other companies here in its SEC industry, Patent Owners & Lessors. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 12, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | IDCC | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $8.24B | median $35.21M | 1 of 12 |
| Forward P/E | 27.6× | median 13.8× | 2 of 4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.7× | median 11.7× | 2 of 6 |
| P/S | 10.5× | median 4.2× | 5 of 12 |
| FCF yield | 6.7% | median -0.4% | 4 of 12 |
| Operating margin | 43.8% | median -1.3% | 1 of 9 |
| Net margin | 38.3% | median -5.6% | 1 of 9 |
| ROIC | 56.9% | median -3.8% | 2 of 9 |
| ROE | 25.1% | median -9.6% | 1 of 11 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 18.3% | median -2.9% | 4 of 10 |
| Current ratio | 2.9× | median 2.1× | 6 of 12 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 7.1% | median 6.0% | 6 of 11 |
| Share count change | 16.0% | median 0.2% | 2 of 11 |
Green where InterDigital is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDCCInterDigital, Inc. | $8.24B | P/E 27.3× | 56.9% | 7.9 |
| DLBDolby Laboratories, Inc. | $5.65B | P/E 25.0× | 9.9% | 7.2 |
| APPSDigital Turbine, Inc. | $1.16B | P/E – | 9.6% | 4.7 |
| ACTGAcacia Research Corporation | $412.79M | P/E – | -5.9% | 6.5 |
| JYNTJOINT Corp | $99.43M | P/E 26.2× | – | 6.7 |
| VHCVirnetX Holding Corp | $42.76M | P/E – | -1388.0% | 4.4 |
| NTIPNETWORK-1 Technologies, Inc. | $35.21M | P/E – | -92.1% | 4.5 |
| RMCORoyalty Management Holding Corp | $35.20M | P/E – | -1.8% | 4.7 |
| REFRResearch Frontiers Inc | $19.53M | P/E – | – | 3.4 |
| AMODAlpha Modus Holdings, Inc. | $6.46M | P/E – | – | 3.6 |
| XELBXCel Brands, Inc. | $2.82M | P/E – | -37.1% | 3.4 |
| AERAAI Era Corp. | $179,662 | P/E – | 89.4% | 7.5 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.