Irish Continental Group plc (ICGC.L)

Every figure this model derived for ICGC.L, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	102,000,000	`PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities`	2025-12-31
cash	36,700,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2026-01-01
current assets	132,400,000	`CurrentAssets`	2026-01-01
current liabilities	223,400,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2026-01-01
equity	283,600,000	`EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent`	2026-01-01
interest expense	10,200,000	`FinanceCosts`	2025-12-31
ocf	149,900,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	666,700,000	`Revenue`	2025-12-31
sbc	3,800,000	`AdjustmentsForSharebasedPayments`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up ICGC.L on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	13.41
current ratio	0.59
current ratio reported	0.59
ev ebit	13.63
ev owner earnings	26.46
ev sales	1.75
fcf margin	7.18
interest cover	8.39
operating margin	12.84
owner earnings margin	6.61
revenue growth	10.42
revenue growth per share	10.42
roic	27.39
rule of 40	23.26
sbc pct revenue	0.57

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about ICGC.L's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
reports in EUR and quotes in GBP, so the share price is converted at 1 GBP = 1.1664 EUR as at 2026-08-28. Only the price is converted: every figure from the filing is as reported, and only the multiples built on market capitalisation carry the rate
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (durability, growth -- 30% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left