These figures are from 2023-12-31. Nothing newer has been filed for Ferronordic AB in the 33 months since, so the score below is built on that year and not on the company as it stands today. Everything here is still the company's own filing, unchanged — every figure against the element it came from.

Ferronordic AB (FNM.ST)

No price history is stored for FNM.ST, so there is no chart to draw. Every figure below is read from the filings and does not depend on one.

Financials Annual

Figures

Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›

Ferronordic AB reported revenue of 2.9B SEK for the year ending 31 December 2023, up 45.1% from 2B a year earlier. Every figure, period by period ›

0 1B 2B 3B 4B 5B

FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23

Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

2.5

SBC / sales 0.0%

Capex / sales 5.2%

Accruals -1.7%

DSO 80.3 days

Asset turnover 0.61×

FCF margin -6.1%

Gross margin 13.2%

OCF margin -0.94%

Profit margin -3.7%

ROA -2.3%

ROCE -4.4%

ROE -6.6%

Adj. EBITDA margin -4.0%

OE margin -6.1%

Oper. margin -4.0%

ROIC -4.9%

16 of 19 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

0.5

0 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

2.6

Gross margin stability across years 2.1 pp

Cash-flow margin stability 11.2 pp

Revenue growth in the worst year on record -67.4%

3 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

4.3

Net debt / Eq 0.15×

Debt / Eq 0.41×

Retained / assets 21.5%

Cash / Debt 0.63×

Equity / Assets 34.5%

F-score 2.2 pts

Current ratio 1.2×

Quick ratio 0.52×

Interest cover -2.4×

10 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

4.0

Gross profit Y/Y +50.8%

Sales/sh Y/Y +45.1%

EPS Y/Y -124.3%

Most recent margin move -12.2

Operating margin trend -3.7

5 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.