FinVolution Group (FINV) · Peers
FinVolution Group against the 9 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 616x (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 10, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | FINV | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $4.18B | median $210.58M | 2 of 10 |
| P/E | 11.5× | median 4.9× | 2 of 5 |
| Forward P/E | 0.6× | median 6.4× | 7 of 7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× | median 5.3× | 3 of 6 |
| P/S | 2.2× | median 0.7× | 3 of 10 |
| FCF yield | 6.1% | median -67.3% | 2 of 10 |
| Operating margin | 21.5% | median 8.2% | 5 of 10 |
| Net margin | 18.7% | median -0.1% | 2 of 10 |
| ROIC | 24.6% | median 13.7% | 3 of 8 |
| ROE | 15.4% | median 4.5% | 4 of 9 |
| EPS growth (yearly) | 0.0% | median 20.9% | 3 of 4 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 1.1% | median 1.6% | 7 of 10 |
| Share count change | 1.1% | median 10.9% | 8 of 9 |
Green where FinVolution Group is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FINVFinVolution Group | $4.18B | P/E 11.5× | 24.6% | 7.6 |
| FIGRFigure Technology Solutions, Inc. | $6.70B | P/E 28.3× | 17.0% | 5.5 |
| PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc. | $3.04B | P/E 7.8× | 4.0% | 4.7 |
| TREELendingTree, Inc. | $356.46M | P/E 2.0× | 13.7% | 7.3 |
| UWMCUWM Holdings Corp | $354.40M | P/E – | 27.9% | 5.0 |
| ONITOnity Group Inc. | $210.58M | P/E 1.5× | 117.4% | 7.0 |
| BETRBetter Home & Finance Holding Co | $188.87M | P/E – | – | 4.8 |
| FOAFinance of America Companies Inc. | $187.35M | P/E – | -8.1% | 4.1 |
| BLNEBeeline Holdings, Inc. | $25.75M | P/E – | -33.1% | 3.0 |
| TAAGAwareness Group, Inc. | $357,653 | P/E – | – | 3.2 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.