EnerSys (ENS) · Peers
EnerSys against the 41 other companies here in its SEC industry, Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 42, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | ENS | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $6.08B | median $105.07M | 2 of 41 |
| P/E | 17.3× | median 22.9× | 5 of 6 |
| Forward P/E | 12.7× | median 14.6× | 4 of 7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.9× | median 15.9× | 4 of 7 |
| P/S | 1.6× | median 1.4× | 20 of 40 |
| FCF yield | 11.8% | median -23.0% | 2 of 41 |
| Dividend yield | 0.6% | median 4.1% | 4 of 5 |
| Gross margin | 30.5% | median 22.5% | 12 of 38 |
| Operating margin | 13.0% | median -52.7% | 1 of 36 |
| Net margin | 9.3% | median -49.7% | 2 of 34 |
| ROIC | 15.4% | median -57.6% | 2 of 28 |
| ROE | 17.9% | median -36.3% | 2 of 28 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 2.8% | median 15.0% | 22 of 30 |
| EPS growth (yearly) | 23.0% | median 1.0% | 1 of 4 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.9× | median 1.7× | 3 of 4 |
| Current ratio | 3.0× | median 1.6× | 14 of 42 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.7% | median 8.8% | 32 of 41 |
| Share count change | -5.7% | median 8.0% | 36 of 40 |
Green where EnerSys is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENSEnerSys | $6.08B | P/E 17.3× | 15.4% | 6.1 |
| XCHXCHG Ltd | $7.29B | P/E – | -397.6% | 2.1 |
| NOVTNovanta Inc | $4.87B | P/E 78.9× | 6.5% | 4.9 |
| ATKRAtkore Inc. | $3.21B | P/E – | 1.8% | 4.2 |
| QSQuantumScape Corp | $2.47B | P/E – | -158.9% | 3.9 |
| SPBSpectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | $1.82B | P/E 22.9× | 4.2% | 5.7 |
| ENREnergizer Holdings, Inc. | $1.49B | P/E 18.2× | – | 5.3 |
| AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc. | $1.13B | P/E – | -63.6% | 4.4 |
| EMATEvolution Metals & Technologies Corp. | $957.57M | P/E – | – | 2.0 |
| EOSEEos Energy Enterprises, Inc. | $662.79M | P/E – | – | 4.5 |
| ENVXEnovix Corp | $546.43M | P/E – | -52.9% | 3.2 |
| NRGVEnergy Vault Holdings, Inc. | $516.42M | P/E – | -57.6% | 4.5 |
| SLDPSolid Power, Inc. | $458.64M | P/E – | -32.8% | 3.3 |
| FLNCFluence Energy, Inc. | $298.70M | P/E – | -10.6% | 4.4 |
| SESSES AI Corp | $260.74M | P/E – | -241.0% | 5.0 |
| ELVAElectrovaya Inc. | $253.49M | P/E – | – | 3.6 |
| AETNAeternum Health, Inc. | $237.91M | P/E 176.8× | – | 3.0 |
| BURUNuburu, Inc. | $218.59M | P/E – | -27.1% | 2.1 |
| MVSTMicrovast Holdings, Inc. | $199.27M | P/E 3.9× | 1.0% | 4.6 |
| CHPTChargePoint Holdings, Inc. | $178.95M | P/E – | -119.2% | 3.9 |
| BYRNByrna Technologies Inc. | $109.84M | P/E – | -8.7% | 4.7 |
| ULBIUltralife Corp | $100.31M | P/E – | -3.9% | 4.4 |
| NEOVNeoVolta Inc. | $93.32M | P/E – | -69.3% | 4.4 |
| EPOWE-Power Inc. | $87.71M | P/E – | -30.9% | 3.4 |
| BLNKBlink Charging Co. | $61.38M | P/E – | -7749.6% | 4.5 |
| NVXNOVONIX Ltd | $53.64M | P/E – | 89.3% | 5.0 |
| DFLIDragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. | $41.49M | P/E – | -137.9% | 3.5 |
| STISolidion Technology Inc. | $37.37M | P/E – | – | 4.5 |
| LASELaser Photonics Corp | $36.23M | P/E – | – | 3.4 |
| PPSIPioneer Power Solutions, Inc. | $30.08M | P/E – | -78.7% | 4.4 |
| AUSIAura Systems Inc | $27.05M | P/E – | – | 2.4 |
| BEEMBeam Global | $20.21M | P/E – | -70.5% | 4.8 |
| FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc. | $9.08M | P/E – | -219.6% | 3.8 |
| UCARU Power Ltd | $6.00M | P/E – | -17.2% | 4.5 |
| GWHESS Tech, Inc. | $5.17M | P/E – | -4733.1% | 2.8 |
| XPONExpion Energy, Inc. | $3.70M | P/E – | – | 3.6 |
| TOGITurnOnGreen, Inc. | $3.66M | P/E – | – | 3.9 |
| POLAPolar Power, Inc. | $3.22M | P/E – | -813.7% | 2.7 |
| ELPWElong Power Holding Ltd. | $2.12M | P/E – | – | 4.5 |
| NVVENuvve Holding Corp. | $983,856 | P/E – | – | 3.7 |
| OZSCOzop Energy Solutions, Inc. | $47,174 | P/E – | – | 2.1 |
And 1 smaller ones.
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.