Dycom Industries Inc (DY) · Peers
Dycom Industries against the 7 other companies here in its SEC industry, Water, Sewer, Pipeline, Comm & Power Line Construction. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 8, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | DY | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $7.62B | median $1.73B | 2 of 8 |
| P/E | 24.5× | median 29.6× | 5 of 5 |
| Forward P/E | 14.9× | median 21.8× | 6 of 7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.3× | median 14.4× | 5 of 6 |
| P/S | 1.2× | median 1.1× | 4 of 8 |
| FCF yield | 5.8% | median 1.6% | 1 of 8 |
| Gross margin | 15.3% | median 12.1% | 3 of 7 |
| Operating margin | 7.7% | median 3.7% | 2 of 8 |
| Net margin | 5.0% | median 2.5% | 2 of 7 |
| ROIC | 9.2% | median 9.1% | 4 of 7 |
| ROE | 16.4% | median 8.7% | 2 of 6 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 15.3% | median 15.8% | 4 of 6 |
| EPS growth (yearly) | 57.0% | median 7.2% | 1 of 5 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.8× | median 1.9× | 2 of 4 |
| Current ratio | 2.6× | median 2.1× | 3 of 8 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.6% | median 0.3% | 3 of 8 |
| Share count change | -0.2% | median 0.1% | 5 of 7 |
Green where Dycom Industries is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYDycom Industries Inc | $7.62B | P/E 24.5× | 9.2% | 5.6 |
| MTZMasTec Inc | $15.34B | P/E 31.0× | 4.9% | 4.8 |
| MYRGMYR Group Inc. | $4.36B | P/E 26.4× | 28.2% | 6.2 |
| PRIMPrimoris Services Corp | $3.94B | P/E 28.2× | 7.6% | 4.6 |
| PLPCPreformed Line Products Co | $1.73B | P/E 40.0× | 11.5% | 5.2 |
| ITGITG, Inc. | $926.40M | P/E – | – | 4.1 |
| ESOAEnergy Services of America CORP | $171.85M | P/E – | 10.7% | 5.0 |
| SKKRantizo | $17.48M | P/E – | -22.5% | 3.3 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.