Stock Scorer

Decent Holding Inc. (DXST) · Peers

Decent Holding against the 16 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 495x (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 17, highest first.

Measure by measure

MeasureDXSTPeer medianRank
Market value $21.61M median $219.41M 11 of 17
P/S 1.7× median 3.2× 11 of 17
FCF yield -16.0% median -1.3% 12 of 17
Gross margin 26.2% median 31.7% 10 of 16
Operating margin -1.1% median -3.3% 8 of 16
Net margin -2.5% median -3.4% 8 of 15
ROIC -1.5% median 1.9% 8 of 13
ROE -4.2% median -16.5% 8 of 15
Current ratio 1.7× median 1.1× 4 of 17
Stock pay / revenue 0.0% median 0.7% 17 of 17
Share count change 8.3% median 4.2% 7 of 15

Green where Decent Holding is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.

The peers, largest first

CompanyMarket valueP/EROICScore
DXSTDecent Holding Inc. $21.61M P/E – -1.5% 3.8
WMWaste Management Inc $90.68B P/E 31.8× 10.9% 4.7
RSGRepublic Services Inc $70.90B P/E 32.4× 10.3% 4.7
WCNWaste Connections, Inc. $42.32B P/E 39.9× 7.7% 4.8
CLHClean Harbors Inc $16.91B P/E 42.8× 10.5% 4.7
GFLGFL Environmental Inc. $16.27B P/E 6.1× 2.1% 3.7
CWSTCasella Waste Systems Inc $5.60B P/E 982.5× 1.8% 3.7
NVRIEnviri Corp $547.73M P/E – – 4.3
PESIPerma FIX Environmental Services Inc $261.20M P/E – -24.8% 3.4
DBHLDeep Isolation Nuclear, Inc. $177.61M P/E – – 3.0
QRHCQuest Resource Holding Corp $24.05M P/E – -7.5% 4.7
VIVKVivakor, Inc. $12.11M P/E – -83.5% 4.1
SNTWSummit Networks Inc. $9.03M P/E – – 3.0
AWXAvalon Holdings Corp $8.22M P/E 6.9× 3.8% 5.7
RENXRenX Enterprises Corp. $4.55M P/E – -17.5% 4.3
CDTGCDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Ltd $3.11M P/E – -30.1% 3.7
SNRGSusGlobal Energy Corp. $1.42M P/E – – 1.9

The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.