DUKE Robotics Corp. (DUKR) · Peers
DUKE Robotics against the 12 other companies here in its SEC industry, Aircraft. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 13, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | DUKR | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $15.76M | median $2.10B | 12 of 13 |
| P/S | 41.8× | median 4.9× | 3 of 12 |
| FCF yield | -10.9% | median -13.2% | 7 of 13 |
| Gross margin | 32.9% | median 29.8% | 6 of 11 |
| Operating margin | -559.4% | median -17.9% | 7 of 9 |
| Net margin | -620.7% | median -23.9% | 8 of 10 |
| ROE | -35.2% | median -42.3% | 6 of 12 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 22.4% | median 9.5% | 2 of 6 |
| Current ratio | 14.5× | median 6.9× | 4 of 13 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 108.8% | median 4.3% | 4 of 11 |
| Share count change | 0.0% | median 45.1% | 10 of 11 |
Green where DUKE Robotics is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUKRDUKE Robotics Corp. | $15.76M | P/E – | – | 3.9 |
| BAThe Boeing Company | $150.34B | P/E 67.3× | 10.0% | 4.2 |
| EMBJEmbraer S.A. | $12.87B | P/E 35.9× | 32.1% | 6.9 |
| AVAVAeroVironment Inc | $6.16B | P/E – | -5.4% | 5.2 |
| JOBYJoby Aviation, Inc. | $4.61B | P/E – | -321.3% | 4.2 |
| BETABETA Technologies, Inc. | $4.06B | P/E – | -121.3% | 4.2 |
| ACHRArcher Aviation Inc. | $3.13B | P/E – | -180.0% | 3.3 |
| AVEXAEVEX Corp. | $1.06B | P/E 45.7× | – | 5.0 |
| AIROAIRO Group Holdings, Inc. | $167.25M | P/E – | -2.4% | 4.7 |
| DPRODraganfly Inc. | $107.28M | P/E – | – | 3.7 |
| UAVSAgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. | $44.34M | P/E – | -65.3% | 4.3 |
| MOBMobilicom Ltd | $37.66M | P/E – | – | 3.9 |
| BRQLDYNAMIC AEROSPACE SYSTEMS Corp | $6.17M | P/E – | -66.1% | 2.5 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.