Every figure this model derived for DQ, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
173,011,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
856,054,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
2,696,177,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
501,622,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
4,406,727,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
ocf
49,666,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
665,415,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
55,817,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DQ on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
3.34
current ratio
5.95
current ratio reported
5.37
deferred revenue growth
31.17
dilution pct
1.8
ev owner earnings
-21.55
ev sales
5.8
fcf margin
-18.54
growth cv
2.81
operating margin
-40.61
owner earnings margin
-26.92
revenue growth
-35.34
revenue growth per share
-36.48
roic
-5.84
rpo growth
5.62
rule of 40
-75.95
sbc pct revenue
8.39
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DQ's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (5.8x) instead
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 753M of net cash against a 123M annual burn is 6.1 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
no interest expense tagged while 103M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect