Every figure this model derived for D, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2020-03-31
cash
851,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
8,997,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
11,574,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
29,147,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
2,102,000,000
InterestAndDebtExpense
2026-03-31
ocf
5,060,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
17,449,000,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
46,000,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
D on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
40.49
current ratio
0.78
current ratio reported
0.78
dilution pct
1.9
ebit cagr
42.62
ebit yoy
26.01
ev ebit
22.81
ev owner earnings
20.85
ev sales
5.99
fcf margin
29.0
growth cv
3.43
interest cover
2.18
net debt ebitda
6.56
operating margin
26.27
owner earnings margin
28.74
revenue growth
17.08
revenue growth per share
14.91
roic
4.82
rpo growth
-11.17
rule of 40
43.35
sbc pct revenue
0.26
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about D's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2020-03-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions