Every figure this model derived for CVX, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CVX on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.83
current ratio
1.25
current ratio reported
1.25
dilution pct
2.15
ebit cagr
-12.96
ebit yoy
64.04
ev ebit
18.09
ev owner earnings
16.13
ev sales
2.09
fcf margin
12.94
growth cv
1.76
interest cover
16.87
net debt ebitda
0.86
operating margin
11.54
owner earnings margin
12.94
revenue growth
11.17
revenue growth per share
8.83
roic
8.24
rule of 40
22.72
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CVX's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage