Every figure this model derived for COE, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
COE on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-13.25
current ratio
3.21
current ratio reported
0.63
deferred revenue growth
69.91
dilution pct
2.27
ev owner earnings
652.77
ev sales
55.91
fcf margin
9.96
growth cv
1.81
operating margin
-15.09
owner earnings margin
8.57
revenue growth
88.59
revenue growth per share
84.4
rpo growth
69.77
rule of 40
73.5
sbc pct revenue
1.39
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about COE's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (55.9x) instead
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover