Coronado Global Resources Inc. (CODQL) · Peers
Coronado Global Resources against the 8 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 122x (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 9, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | CODQL | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $20.12M | median $2.52B | 9 of 9 |
| P/S | 0.0× | median 1.0× | 8 of 8 |
| FCF yield | -1705.0% | median 0.4% | 9 of 9 |
| Dividend yield | 41.4% | median 0.8% | 1 of 7 |
| Gross margin | 20.7% | median 10.4% | 2 of 5 |
| Operating margin | -17.7% | median 1.9% | 8 of 8 |
| Net margin | -33.6% | median 2.3% | 8 of 8 |
| ROIC | -33.1% | median -3.0% | 8 of 8 |
| ROE | -297.3% | median 2.7% | 8 of 8 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | -2.4% | median 7.0% | 8 of 9 |
| Current ratio | 1.2× | median 2.8× | 9 of 9 |
| Stock pay / revenue | -0.2% | median 0.7% | 8 of 8 |
| Share count change | -0.3% | median 0.7% | 5 of 7 |
Green where Coronado Global Resources is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CODQLCoronado Global Resources Inc. | $20.12M | P/E – | -33.1% | 3.4 |
| HCCWarrior MET Coal, Inc. | $4.75B | P/E 21.7× | 8.1% | 6.1 |
| CNRCore Natural Resources, Inc. | $4.46B | P/E 44.5× | 1.7% | 6.0 |
| ARLPAlliance Resource Partners LP | $3.31B | P/E 12.4× | – | 7.1 |
| BTUPeabody Energy Corp | $2.93B | P/E – | -5.9% | 4.6 |
| AMRAlpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | $2.11B | P/E – | -3.0% | 4.0 |
| METCRamaco Resources, Inc. | $350.71M | P/E – | -10.0% | 3.8 |
| NCNacco Industries Inc | $256.96M | P/E 14.6× | 3.7% | 5.6 |
| ARECAmerican Resources Corp | $121.95M | P/E 2.2× | -18.9% | 3.9 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.