Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) · Peers
Core & Main against the 8 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 509x (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 9, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | CNM | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $8.22B | median $70.61M | 1 of 9 |
| P/E | 18.3× | median 10.3× | 1 of 6 |
| Forward P/E | 13.3× | median 10.6× | 2 of 5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.1× | median 4.9× | 2 of 5 |
| P/S | 1.1× | median 1.1× | 5 of 9 |
| FCF yield | 7.4% | median -4.0% | 3 of 9 |
| Gross margin | 27.1% | median 3.5% | 2 of 8 |
| Operating margin | 9.5% | median -6.8% | 3 of 9 |
| Net margin | 5.9% | median 2.0% | 4 of 8 |
| ROIC | 14.3% | median 19.7% | 5 of 7 |
| ROE | 22.0% | median 18.6% | 4 of 8 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 11.2% | median -0.0% | 1 of 4 |
| Current ratio | 2.3× | median 2.1× | 5 of 9 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.2% | median 0.0% | 4 of 9 |
| Share count change | -1.8% | median 1.3% | 7 of 8 |
Green where Core & Main is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNMCore & Main, Inc. | $8.22B | P/E 18.3× | 14.3% | 5.4 |
| POOLPool Corp | $6.29B | P/E 15.5× | 20.0% | 5.0 |
| GOLDGold.com, Inc. | $1.12B | P/E 13.9× | 19.4% | 6.3 |
| AENTAlliance Entertainment Holding Corp | $229.39M | P/E 10.3× | 26.6% | 5.9 |
| SGLASino Green Land Corp. | $79.39M | P/E – | – | 2.9 |
| YDDLOne & one Green Technologies. INC | $61.83M | P/E 5.2× | 22.9% | 6.3 |
| SORAAsiaStrategy | $59.18M | P/E 4.8× | -4.9% | 3.8 |
| BGMSBio Green Med Solution, Inc. | $6.02M | P/E – | – | 4.0 |
| GNLNGreenlane Holdings, Inc. | $1.43M | P/E – | -230.0% | 3.2 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.