Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI) · Peers
Colliers International Group against the 37 other companies here in its SEC industry, Real Estate. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 38, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | CIGI | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $4.54B | median $405.45M | 5 of 35 |
| P/E | 20.2× | median 20.4× | 11 of 21 |
| Forward P/E | 11.8× | median 20.5× | 12 of 15 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× | median 13.3× | 13 of 20 |
| P/S | 0.8× | median 4.8× | 26 of 32 |
| FCF yield | 5.5% | median 0.7% | 12 of 34 |
| Dividend yield | 0.3% | median 2.8% | 12 of 15 |
| Gross margin | 35.4% | median 32.9% | 7 of 16 |
| Operating margin | 6.7% | median 0.6% | 13 of 32 |
| Net margin | 4.0% | median 2.9% | 16 of 35 |
| ROIC | 9.9% | median 0.4% | 4 of 29 |
| ROE | 14.6% | median 1.0% | 3 of 33 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 8.0% | median 4.3% | 12 of 30 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.3× | median 4.1× | 12 of 16 |
| Current ratio | 1.2× | median 1.7× | 12 of 17 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 1.0% | median 2.1% | 20 of 35 |
| Share count change | 1.8% | median 1.9% | 16 of 31 |
Green where Colliers International Group is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIGIColliers International Group Inc. | $4.54B | P/E 20.2× | 9.9% | 5.7 |
| CBRECBRE Group Inc Class A | $37.82B | P/E 29.1× | 12.1% | 5.3 |
| BPYPPBrookfield Property Partners L.P. | $10.66B | P/E – | – | 3.3 |
| TRNOTerreno Realty Corp | $6.98B | P/E 18.0× | 3.1% | 6.4 |
| FSVFirstService Corp | $6.20B | P/E 32.5× | 11.6% | 5.6 |
| MRPMillrose Properties, Inc. | $3.65B | P/E 7.7× | 6.2% | 8.1 |
| VTMXVesta Real Estate Corporation, S.A.B. de C.V. | $3.26B | P/E 13.5× | – | 6.8 |
| CURBCurbline Properties Corp. | $2.77B | P/E 84.3× | 1.2% | 6.2 |
| CWKCushman & Wakefield Ltd. | $2.63B | P/E 29.8× | 8.5% | 5.6 |
| UEUrban Edge Properties | $2.46B | P/E 22.8× | – | 7.2 |
| GTYGetty Realty Corp | $1.76B | P/E 17.6× | 5.4% | 6.8 |
| BXDCBlackstone Digital Infrastructure Trust Inc. | $1.58B | P/E 222.9× | – | 4.1 |
| IIPRInnovative Industrial Properties Inc | $1.44B | P/E 10.5× | 5.3% | 6.8 |
| FORForestar Group Inc. | $1.31B | P/E 7.7× | 7.5% | 4.7 |
| FPHFive Point Holdings, LLC | $643.38M | P/E 12.1× | -0.2% | 7.1 |
| HPPHudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | $558.69M | P/E – | -0.9% | 5.7 |
| AHRTAH Realty Trust, Inc. | $445.32M | P/E – | 2.6% | 5.3 |
| TRCTejon Ranch Co | $441.53M | P/E 73.1× | -0.1% | 5.2 |
| FRPHFrp Holdings Ord | $369.38M | P/E 3847.7× | 0.7% | 3.6 |
| SKYHSky Harbour Group Corp | $313.56M | P/E 338.6× | -11.6% | 3.9 |
| OPIOffice Properties Income Trust | $290.01M | P/E – | 0.1% | 3.1 |
| MLPMaui Land & Pineapple Co Inc | $288.55M | P/E – | -16.5% | 2.9 |
| CHCIComstock Holding Companies, Inc. | $183.84M | P/E 10.8× | 23.5% | 8.2 |
| CMTGClaros Mortgage Trust, Inc. | $162.95M | P/E – | -0.9% | 2.1 |
| OZBelpointe PREP, LLC | $142.04M | P/E – | -56.7% | 4.6 |
| BEEPMobile Infrastructure Corp | $106.55M | P/E – | -0.3% | 2.9 |
| SRGSeritage Growth Properties | $91.24M | P/E – | -7.2% | 3.6 |
| LPALogistic Properties of the Americas | $85.43M | P/E 5.3× | 6.0% | 6.5 |
| AEIAlset Inc. | $24.39M | P/E – | -10.0% | 3.5 |
| DUOFangdd Network Group Ltd. | $21.58M | P/E – | -23.7% | 4.1 |
| AIREreAlpha Tech Corp. | $5.80M | P/E – | -395.5% | 5.3 |
| CWDCaliberCos Inc. | $4.31M | P/E – | – | 3.2 |
| MYCBMy City Builders, Inc. | $2.28M | P/E – | – | 3.1 |
| CSUICannabis Suisse Corp. | $544,243 | P/E 5.1× | -150.5% | 1.7 |
| AOXYAdvanced Oxygen Technologies Inc | $250,264 | P/E 75.8× | 1.7% | 5.9 |
| RWDMURedwood Mortgage Investors IX | – | P/E – | – | 6.3 |
| WNHKWinning Catering Group, Inc. | – | P/E – | – | 4.6 |
| CLBZCollab Z Inc. | – | P/E – | – | 4.0 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.