Every figure this model derived for BW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
3.99
current ratio
1.73
current ratio reported
1.45
deferred revenue growth
37.8
dilution pct
14.95
ebit yoy
879.44
ev ebit
38.15
ev owner earnings
-14.75
ev sales
1.04
fcf margin
-7.08
growth cv
8.51
interest cover
4.48
operating margin
2.74
owner earnings margin
-7.08
revenue growth
42.65
revenue growth per share
24.09
rpo growth
521.86
rule of 40
45.38
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2015-12-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
invested capital is -229M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
gross profit not tagged since 2019-06-30; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`