Every figure this model derived for BCH, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BCH on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
44.46
ebit cagr
182.24
ebit yoy
-6.72
fcf margin
97.53
interest cover
0.98
operating margin
41.95
owner earnings margin
97.53
revenue growth
-6.76
revenue growth per share
-6.76
roic
38.66
rule of 40
35.19
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BCH's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2024-12-31 (1y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
revenue period ends 2024-12-31 (605 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
reports in CLP while its share price is quoted in USD, and no exchange rate could be used (no rate for USD to CLP that is less than 30 days old, and this is not a refresh). Every multiple would pair one currency with another, so none of them is a ratio — set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml in CLP to score it
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left