Every figure this model derived for AZ, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AZ on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-194.97
current ratio
11.42
current ratio reported
11.42
ev owner earnings
-6.2
ev sales
32.52
fcf margin
-280.49
growth cv
1.31
interest cover
-30.69
operating margin
-449.2
owner earnings margin
-524.93
revenue growth
42.8
revenue growth per share
42.8
roic
-44.07
rule of 40
-406.4
sbc pct revenue
244.44
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AZ's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (32.5x) instead
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage