Every figure this model derived for AXR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-04-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AXR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
24.89
dilution pct
0.45
ebit cagr
-12.67
ebit yoy
2.35
ev ebit
5.7
ev owner earnings
5.73
ev sales
1.34
fcf margin
24.18
growth cv
2.8
operating margin
23.45
owner earnings margin
23.33
revenue growth
6.34
revenue growth per share
5.87
roic
11.07
rule of 40
29.79
sbc pct revenue
0.85
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AXR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
gross profit last tagged 2013-04-30 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 3 inputs could be computed (interest cover, liquidity not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (durability, resilience -- 25% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left
no interest expense tagged while 0M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect