ASML HOLDING NV (ASML)

Every figure this model derived for ASML, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	1,573,600,000	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2025-12-31
cash	13,321,900,000	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2025-12-31
current assets	30,616,100,000	`AssetsCurrent`	2025-12-31
current liabilities	24,263,900,000	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2025-12-31
equity	19,612,200,000	`StockholdersEquity`	2025-12-31
interest expense	118,300,000	`InterestExpenseNonoperating`	2025-12-31
ocf	12,658,500,000	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	32,667,300,000	`RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax`	2025-12-31
sbc	202,300,000	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up ASML on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	38.36
current ratio	3.71
current ratio reported	1.26
deferred revenue growth	27.33
dilution pct	-1.19
ev ebit	48.87
ev owner earnings	50.75
ev sales	16.91
fcf margin	33.93
interest cover	95.53
operating margin	34.6
owner earnings margin	33.31
revenue growth	15.58
revenue growth per share	16.98
roic	89.37
rpo growth	7.39
rule of 40	50.18
sbc pct revenue	0.62

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about ASML's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
reports in EUR and quotes in USD, so the share price is converted at 1 USD = 0.8583 EUR as at 2026-08-28. Only the price is converted: every figure from the filing is as reported, and only the multiples built on market capitalisation carry the rate
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (durability, growth -- 30% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left