Every figure this model derived for APO, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
APO on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
27.31
dilution pct
-1.72
ebit yoy
23.91
ev ebit
9.02
ev owner earnings
7.68
ev sales
1.82
fcf margin
26.39
growth cv
0.92
interest cover
10.23
operating margin
20.2
owner earnings margin
23.74
revenue growth
41.23
revenue growth per share
43.71
roic
90.68
rule of 40
61.43
sbc pct revenue
2.65
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about APO's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity