Every figure this model derived for ALX, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
303,312,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
equity
223,623,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
49,554,000
InterestAndDebtExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
27,162,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
214,802,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
394,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ALX on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
46.27
dilution pct
0.05
ebit cagr
-7.09
ebit yoy
-16.12
ev ebit
17.89
ev owner earnings
41.08
ev sales
5.12
fcf margin
12.65
growth cv
3.31
interest cover
1.24
operating margin
28.61
owner earnings margin
12.46
revenue growth
-1.51
revenue growth per share
-1.56
rule of 40
27.1
sbc pct revenue
0.18
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ALX's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2018-12-31, 2738 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
invested capital is -80M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity