Every figure this model derived for ALVO-SDB.ST, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ALVO-SDB.ST on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
27.6
current ratio
1.89
current ratio reported
1.89
ebit yoy
12.3
ev ebit
31.19
ev owner earnings
-19.99
ev sales
7.87
fcf margin
-36.98
growth cv
1.35
interest cover
0.52
net debt ebitda
13.93
operating margin
25.22
owner earnings margin
-39.36
revenue growth
43.4
revenue growth per share
43.4
roic
7.67
rule of 40
68.63
sbc pct revenue
2.38
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ALVO-SDB.ST's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
reports in USD and quotes in SEK, so the share price is converted at 1 SEK = 0.1051 USD as at 2026-08-28. Only the price is converted: every figure from the filing is as reported, and only the multiples built on market capitalisation carry the rate
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth