Every figure this model derived for AIM, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2024-12-31
cash
9,964,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
10,432,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
4,946,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
7,744,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
1,138,000
InterestExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
-14,374,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
95,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
60,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AIM on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
2.11
current ratio reported
2.11
dilution pct
189.16
ev owner earnings
-0.34
ev sales
52.2
interest cover
-9.79
revenue growth
-21.49
revenue growth per share
-72.85
roic
-175.21
rule of 40
-11745.7
sbc pct revenue
63.16
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AIM's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, owner earnings margin, fcf margin, net margin, ocf margin, ebitda margin -- owner earnings margin came out at -15,194% against a scale that tops out near 1,750%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 95,000 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2024-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - ManufacturingCosts
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (52.2x) instead
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage