Aecom (ACM) · Peers
Aecom against the 9 other companies here in its SEC industry, Services-Engineering Services. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 10, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | ACM | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $7.59B | median $683.50M | 3 of 10 |
| P/E | 26.3× | median 25.3× | 4 of 8 |
| Forward P/E | 14.7× | median 20.9× | 5 of 6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× | median 18.3× | 6 of 7 |
| P/S | 0.5× | median 2.8× | 10 of 10 |
| FCF yield | 2.7% | median 3.2% | 6 of 10 |
| Dividend yield | 2.0% | median 0.8% | 1 of 4 |
| Gross margin | 5.7% | median 28.5% | 8 of 8 |
| Operating margin | 4.1% | median 7.1% | 7 of 9 |
| Net margin | 1.9% | median 5.9% | 8 of 10 |
| ROIC | 12.8% | median 10.0% | 3 of 9 |
| ROE | 13.1% | median 14.8% | 6 of 10 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 4.9% | median 14.8% | 6 of 7 |
| EPS growth (yearly) | 38.0% | median 23.6% | 2 of 4 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.0× | median 1.6× | 3 of 5 |
| Current ratio | 1.3× | median 1.7× | 7 of 10 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.3% | median 1.1% | 9 of 10 |
| Share count change | -2.3% | median 1.9% | 10 of 10 |
Green where Aecom is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMAecom | $7.59B | P/E 26.3× | 12.8% | 4.8 |
| TTEKTetra Tech Inc | $8.89B | P/E 20.4× | 19.9% | 5.7 |
| STNStantec Inc | $7.90B | P/E 23.6× | – | 5.6 |
| VSECVSE Corp | $4.60B | P/E 61.4× | 2.6% | 4.3 |
| WLDNWilldan Group, Inc. | $1.10B | P/E 16.8× | 10.7% | 6.0 |
| MGMistras Group, Inc. | $683.50M | P/E 25.3× | 9.3% | 5.5 |
| JLHLJulong Holding Ltd | $99.95M | P/E 27.2× | 322.4% | 5.3 |
| HYORHyOrc Corp | $56.77M | P/E – | -2.1% | 2.7 |
| ACFNAcorn Energy, Inc. | $46.00M | P/E 29.8× | 12.6% | 5.2 |
| OFALOFA Group | $9.46M | P/E – | -88.5% | 3.5 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.