Every figure this model derived for ZCMD, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
152,561
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
13,922,632
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
16,962,126
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
1,526,630
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
18,630,686
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
ocf
845,391
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
11,374,996
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
3,705,336
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ZCMD on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-19.3
current ratio
12.32
current ratio reported
11.11
deferred revenue growth
-26.39
dilution pct
425.94
fcf margin
6.09
operating margin
-54.43
owner earnings margin
-26.48
revenue growth
-28.3
revenue growth per share
-86.37
roic
-103.89
rule of 40
-82.73
sbc pct revenue
32.57
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ZCMD's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover