Every figure this model derived for YUMC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
638,000,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
1,386,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
2,350,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
2,436,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
5,357,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
1,578,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
12,438,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
43,000,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
YUMC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
15.2
current ratio
1.06
current ratio reported
0.96
deferred revenue growth
10.66
dilution pct
-4.88
ebit cagr
25.25
ebit yoy
12.82
fcf margin
7.56
growth cv
1.05
operating margin
11.11
owner earnings margin
7.21
revenue growth
8.78
revenue growth per share
14.36
roic
27.11
rule of 40
19.89
sbc pct revenue
0.35
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about YUMC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
no interest expense tagged while 56M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect