Every figure this model derived for YCBD, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
191,419
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
2,118,339
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
7,696,522
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
3,079,569
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
8,212,270
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-2,217,871
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
20,931,471
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2022-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
YCBD on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-12.85
current ratio
3.07
current ratio reported
2.5
deferred revenue growth
11.99
dilution pct
647.25
fcf margin
-11.51
operating margin
-13.87
owner earnings margin
-11.51
revenue growth
10.01
revenue growth per share
-85.28
roic
-37.59
rule of 40
-3.86
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about YCBD's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2022-03-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 2M of net cash against a 2M annual burn is 0.9 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
no interest expense tagged while 0M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect