Every figure this model derived for XOM, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
29,174,000,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
12,342,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
100,793,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
88,830,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
259,380,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
775,000,000
InterestExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
59,727,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
368,757,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
XOM on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
20.34
current ratio
1.13
current ratio reported
1.13
ebit cagr
-14.29
ebit yoy
0.47
ev ebit
14.76
ev owner earnings
21.91
ev sales
1.82
fcf margin
8.29
growth cv
1.75
interest cover
58.52
net debt ebitda
0.35
operating margin
12.3
owner earnings margin
8.29
revenue growth
9.07
revenue growth per share
9.07
roic
12.55
rule of 40
21.37
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about XOM's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions