Every figure this model derived for WYFI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
482,153,549
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
56,056,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
107,369,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
136,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
337,386,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
6,573,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
141,593,356
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
94,503,192
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
8,500,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WYFI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-4.23
current ratio
0.91
current ratio reported
0.79
deferred revenue growth
53.85
dilution pct
16.8
fcf margin
-360.37
interest cover
-6.08
operating margin
-42.3
owner earnings margin
-369.36
revenue growth
51.67
revenue growth per share
29.85
roic
-9.79
rpo growth
9483.31
rule of 40
9.37
sbc pct revenue
8.99
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WYFI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left