Every figure this model derived for WU, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WU on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
17.79
dilution pct
-3.96
ebit cagr
-8.76
ebit yoy
-9.93
ev ebit
5.98
ev owner earnings
7.33
ev sales
0.95
fcf margin
14.01
interest cover
4.3
net debt ebitda
2.35
operating margin
15.91
owner earnings margin
12.98
revenue growth
-1.63
revenue growth per share
2.42
roic
20.25
rule of 40
14.28
sbc pct revenue
1.02
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WU's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity