Every figure this model derived for WSE, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
19,600,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
32,384,900,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
32,980,600,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
30,805,600,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
1,925,200,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
19,500,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-03-31
ocf
7,553,900,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
2,502,800,000
RevenuesNetOfInterestExpense
2026-03-31
sbc
95,500,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
WSE on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
27.99
current ratio
1.07
current ratio reported
1.07
deferred revenue growth
53.06
dilution pct
-1.53
ebit cagr
-4.68
ebit yoy
-18.88
fcf margin
301.03
interest cover
30.29
operating margin
23.6
owner earnings margin
297.22
revenue growth
19.24
revenue growth per share
21.1
rule of 40
42.84
sbc pct revenue
3.82
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about WSE's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-03-31 (152 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
invested capital is -30,131M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left